[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150629140637.GK18569@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 16:06:37 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: djkurtz@...omium.org, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>, jroedel@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/22] iommu: Propagate error in add_iommu_group
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:28:40AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> The Rockchip iommu uses bus_set_ops to set its iommu-ops for the platform
> bus and currently returns -ENODEV if it encounters a platform_devices that
> does not have an iommu. As add_iommu_group ignored these returns
> till now this worked, but of course starts to fail now.
>
> All two invocations of the add_device callback ignored (or still ignore) the
> return value so I've come with the following small patch to fix the breakage
> that now exists in the 4.2 tree.
>
> There is probably a better solution possible in the longer term, likely
> similar to what Samsung does, but I'm not sure yet how this would work
> with our drm device that needs an iommu mapping without having an
> iommu (the iommus being attached to the crtc-components).
Btw, if you want to test the fix too, here is the link:
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2015-June/013508.html
Regards,
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists