lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150629151220.GL15805@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 11:12:20 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>, oleg@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dave@...olabs.net, riel@...hat.com,
	viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/13] percpu-rwsem: Optimize readers and reduce
 global impact

Hello, Peter.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:32:19AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Agreed, luckily we already have the infrastructure for this, something
> like so?
> 
> --- a/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu-defs.h
> @@ -287,6 +287,16 @@ do {									\
>  	preempt_enable();						\
>  } while (0)
>  
> +#define per_cpu_sum(var)						\
> +({									\
> +	typeof(var) __sum = 0;						\
> +	int cpu;							\

Why not __cpu?

> +	compiletime_assert_atomic_type(__sum);				\
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)					\
> +		__sum += per_cpu(var, cpu);				\
> +	__sum;								\
> +})

But other than that, looks good to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ