[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55917C31.4060107@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 18:11:13 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: "Chalamarla, Tirumalesh" <Tirumalesh.Chalamarla@...iumnetworks.com>
CC: "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rrichter@...ium.com" <rrichter@...ium.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder
On 29/06/15 18:06, Chalamarla, Tirumalesh wrote:
>
>> On Jun 29, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
>>> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
>>> minimal support required.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@...iumnetworks.com>
>>
>> CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.
>>
> thanks.
>
>> Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:
>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html
>>
> will try with this.
>
>> Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
>> should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.
>>
> we are not planning(at this point) to emulate Thunder with QEMU/others.
Fair enough. If cross-cpu VM migration is none of your concern, then
Suzuki's patch should be enough.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists