lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150629214355.GE7943@dastard>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 07:43:55 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Delete unnecessary checks before the function call
 "xfs_qm_dqrele"

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:15:31AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:05:41 +0200
> 
> The xfs_qm_dqrele() function tests whether its argument is NULL and
> then returns immediately.

True.

> Thus the test around the call is not needed.

But wrong.

xfs_dqrele_inode() gets called on every inode in the inode cache,
and this change results in a cacheline in every inode being dirtied
even if they don't have dquots attached. Given the inode cache can
hold tens to hundreds of millions of inodes on large machines, we
don't want to dirty any cachelines we don't need to while walking
the inode cache and releasing dquots...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ