linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Jun 2015 09:53:40 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@...iumnetworks.com>,
	kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
CC:	andre.przywara@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rrichter@...ium.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Enable minimalistic support for Thunder

On 26/06/15 20:51, Tirumalesh Chalamarla wrote:
> In order to allow KVM to run on Thunder implementations, add the
> minimal support required.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@...iumnetworks.com>

CCing the KVM/ARM maintainers should be the first course of action.

Also, you may want to try Suzuki's patch instead:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg117703.html

Constantly adding new CPUs without providing any insight as to how they
should be emulated only brings churn, and not much benefit.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/