[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150630012958.GA23944@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 03:29:58 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com, der.herr@...r.at,
dave@...olabs.net, riel@...hat.com, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] stop_machine: cpu_stop_park() should remove
cpu_stop_work's from list
cpu_stop_park() does cpu_stop_signal_done() but leaves the work on
stopper->works. The owner of this work can free/reuse this memory
right after that and corrupt the list, so if this CPU becomes online
again cpu_stopper_thread() will crash.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 9a70def..12484e5 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -462,13 +462,15 @@ static void cpu_stop_create(unsigned int cpu)
static void cpu_stop_park(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);
- struct cpu_stop_work *work;
+ struct cpu_stop_work *work, *tmp;
unsigned long flags;
/* drain remaining works */
spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(work, &stopper->works, list)
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(work, tmp, &stopper->works, list) {
+ list_del_init(&work->list);
cpu_stop_signal_done(work->done, false);
+ }
stopper->enabled = false;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists