[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878ub1wdur.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 16:00:12 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm tree for 4.2
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:50:09PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@...il.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 14:43 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > This is the main drm pull request for v4.2.
>> >>
>> >> It seems to work ok for me, but it causes quite a few new warnings on
>> >> my Sony VAIO Pro laptop. It's (once more) a regular i5-4200U CPU (aka
>> >> Haswell, aka 4th gen Intel Core i5)
>> >>
>> >> Most of them are in check_crtc_state(), and I currently have 18 of
>> >> these in my log:
>> >>
>> >> [drm:check_crtc_state [i915]] *ERROR* mismatch in
>> >> dpll_hw_state.wrpll (expected 0x90280202, found 0x00000000)
>> >> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 115 at
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:12319
>> >> check_crtc_state+0x8be/0xf60 [i915]()
>> >> pipe state doesn't match!
>> >>
>> >> but there's a few others too:
>> >>
>> >> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1871 at
>> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1362 hsw_disable_ips+0x34/0x160
>> >> [i915]()
>> >> plane A assertion failure (expected on, current off)
>> >>
>> >> WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1871 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1162
>> >> drm_wait_one_vblank+0x148/0x1a0 [drm]()
>> >> vblank not available on crtc 0, ret=-22
>> >>
>> >> and the backtraces aren't all that interesting, but I'm attaching the
>> >> cleaned-up dmesg, duplicate callchains and all.
>> >
>> > Please provide a full dmesg with drm.debug=0x1f in the kernel command
>> > line.
>>
>> Ander, I think I was able to reproduce this on the BDW NUC here. Bisect
>> points at...
>>
>> commit dd3cd74acf12723045a64f1f2c6298ac7b34a5d5
>> Author: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@...el.com>
>> Date: Fri May 15 13:34:29 2015 +0300
>>
>> drm/i915: Don't overwrite (e)DP PLL selection on SKL
>>
>> In the following commit, the place where the contents of dpll_hw_state
>> in crtc_state where zeroed was changed. Prior to that commit, it
>> happened when the new state was allocated, but now that happens just
>> before the call the .crtc_compute_clock() hook. The DP code for SKL,
>> however, sets up the (private) PLL in the encoder compute config
>> function that has already run by the time that memset() is reached,
>> causing the previous value to be lost.
>>
>> This patch fixes the issue by moving the memset() down the call chain,
>> so that it is only called if the values in dpll_hw_state are going to be
>> updated.
>>
>> commit 4978cc93d9ac240b435ce60431aef24239b4c270
>> Author: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@...el.com>
>> Date: Tue Apr 21 17:13:21 2015 +0300
>>
>> drm/i915: Preserve shared DPLL information in new pipe_config
>>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90462
>> Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@...el.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@...el.com>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
>>
>> This doesn't revert cleanly on Linus' master, and I didn't have the time
>> to look deeper right now. However I confirmed that this commit fails and
>> its parent doesn't.
>
> Note that there seems to be two bugs here: Firs one is display state
> checker getting annoyed, which is probably the one Jani bisected to here
> (please confirm).
Right, the above bisect is for the "[drm:check_crtc_state [i915]]
*ERROR* mismatch in dpll_hw_state.wrpll (expected 0x90280202, found
0x00000000)" warning.
> The other is the two backtraces complaining that the pipe is off (both the
> drm_irq.c and the one in hsw_display_ips amount to that) because we seem
> to call disable_planes on a disable pipe, which is bullocks (with runtime
> pm the hw is dead and will just drop the writes).
The "vblank not available on crtc 0, ret=-22" warning bisects to
commit 8c7b5ccb729870e606321b3703e2c2e698c49a95
Author: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@...el.com>
Date: Tue Apr 21 17:13:19 2015 +0300
drm/i915: Use atomic helpers for computing changed flags
Replace the drivers own logic for computing mode_changed, active_changed
and planes_changed flags with the check_modeset() atomic helper. Since
that function needs to compare the crtc's new mode with the current,
this patch also moves the set up of crtc_state->mode earlier in the call
chain.
Note that for the call to check_plane() to work properly, we need to
check new plane state against new crtc state. But since we still use the
plane update helper, which doesn't have a full atomic state, we need to
hack around that in intel_plane_atomic_check().
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
BR,
Jani.
> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists