linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix bug about channel configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150630130307.GO18384@odux.rfo.atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:03:07 +0200
From:	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
To:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<vinod.koul@...el.com>, <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: at_xdmac: fix bug about channel configuration

Vinod,

If you have no objection about his patch, could you take it?

Thanks

Ludovic

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 04:22:26PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> When using descriptor view 2 or higher, we don't write the configuration
> into AT_XDMAC_CC register because this configuration will be fetch from
> the descriptor. Unfortunately, the PROT bit is not updated with this
> method, we have to do it manually before enabling the channel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> index cf1213d..52ca1cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_xdmac.c
> @@ -359,18 +359,19 @@ static void at_xdmac_start_xfer(struct at_xdmac_chan *atchan,
>  	 * descriptor view 2 since some fields of the configuration register
>  	 * depend on transfer size and src/dest addresses.
>  	 */
> -	if (at_xdmac_chan_is_cyclic(atchan)) {
> +	if (at_xdmac_chan_is_cyclic(atchan))
>  		reg = AT_XDMAC_CNDC_NDVIEW_NDV1;
> -		at_xdmac_chan_write(atchan, AT_XDMAC_CC, first->lld.mbr_cfg);
> -	} else if (first->lld.mbr_ubc & AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDV3) {
> +	else if (first->lld.mbr_ubc & AT_XDMAC_MBR_UBC_NDV3)
>  		reg = AT_XDMAC_CNDC_NDVIEW_NDV3;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * No need to write AT_XDMAC_CC reg, it will be done when the
> -		 * descriptor is fecthed.
> -		 */
> +	else
>  		reg = AT_XDMAC_CNDC_NDVIEW_NDV2;
> -	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Even if the register will be updated from the configuration in the
> +	 * descriptor when using view 2 or higher, the PROT bit won't be set
> +	 * properly. This bit can be modified only by using the channel
> +	 * configuration register.
> +	 */
> +	at_xdmac_chan_write(atchan, AT_XDMAC_CC, first->lld.mbr_cfg);
>  
>  	reg |= AT_XDMAC_CNDC_NDDUP
>  	       | AT_XDMAC_CNDC_NDSUP
> -- 
> 2.2.0
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/