linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: enable irqchip routing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55929C0A.9020107@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:39:22 +0100
From:	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To:	Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>,
	"eric.auger@...com" <eric.auger@...com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
	"christoffer.dall@...aro.org" <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	"kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"p.fedin@...sung.com" <p.fedin@...sung.com>,
	"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: arm/arm64: enable irqchip routing

Hi Eric,

On 29/06/15 16:37, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch adds compilation and link against irqchip.
> 
> On ARM, irqchip routing is not really useful since there is
> a single irqchip. However main motivation behind using irqchip
> code is to enable MSI routing code. With the support of in-kernel
> GICv3 ITS emulation, it now seems to be a MUST HAVE requirement.
> 
> Functions previously implemented in vgic.c and substitute
> to more complex irqchip implementation are removed:
> 
> - kvm_send_userspace_msi
> - kvm_irq_map_chip_pin
> - kvm_set_irq
> - kvm_irq_map_gsi.
> 
> They implemented a kernel default identity GSI routing. This is now
> replaced by user-side provided routing.
> 
> Routing standard hooks are now implemented in vgic:
> - kvm_set_routing_entry
> - kvm_set_irq
> - kvm_set_msi
> 
> Both HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP and HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING are defined.
> KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING is advertised and KVM_SET_GSI_ROUTING is allowed.
> 
> MSI routing is not yet allowed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
> 
...

> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 09b1f46..212a5ff 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -2220,47 +2220,67 @@ out_free_irq:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm,
> -		    struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries,
> -		    int gsi)
> +int vgic_irqfd_set_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> +			struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id,
> +			int level, bool line_status)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
> -int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin)
> -{
> -	return pin;
> -}
> -
> -int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id,
> -		u32 irq, int level, bool line_status)
> -{
> -	unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
> +	unsigned int spi_id = e->irqchip.pin + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS;
>  
> -	trace_kvm_set_irq(irq, level, irq_source_id);
> +	trace_kvm_set_irq(spi_id, level, irq_source_id);
>  
>  	BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm));
>  
> -	if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs)
> +	if (spi_id > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level);
> +	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi_id, level);
>  
>  }
>  
> -/* MSI not implemented yet */
> +/**
> + * Populates a kvm routing entry from a user routing entry
> + * @e: kvm internal formatted entry
> + * @ue: user api formatted entry
> + * return 0 on success, -EINVAL on errors.
> + */
> +int kvm_set_routing_entry(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
> +			  const struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *ue)
> +{
> +	int r = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (ue->type) {
> +	case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_IRQCHIP:
> +		e->set = vgic_irqfd_set_irq;
> +		e->irqchip.irqchip = ue->u.irqchip.irqchip;
> +		e->irqchip.pin = ue->u.irqchip.pin;
> +		if ((e->irqchip.pin >= KVM_IRQCHIP_NUM_PINS) ||
> +		    (e->irqchip.irqchip >= KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS))
> +			goto out;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	r = 0;
> +out:
> +	return r;
> +}
> +
>  int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
>  		struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id,
>  		int level, bool line_status)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> -}
> +	struct kvm_msi msi;
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_MSI
> -int kvm_send_userspace_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
> -{
> -	if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi)
> -		return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, msi);
> -	else
> -		return -ENODEV;
> +	switch (e->type) {
> +	case KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI:
> +		msi.address_lo = e->ext_msi.address_lo;
> +		msi.address_hi = e->ext_msi.address_hi;
> +		msi.data = e->ext_msi.data;
> +		msi.flags = e->ext_msi.devid;

You probably meant to write:
+		msi.flags = KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID;
+		msi.devid = e->ext_msi.devid;

With this change I could get it (your patches on top of my v1.5) to work
with my hacked kvmtool - at least with vhost=0. On to fixing irqfd now ...

Cheers,
Andre.

> +		if (kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi)
> +			return kvm->arch.vgic.vm_ops.inject_msi(kvm, &msi);
> +		else
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
>  }
> -#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/