lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 19:15:24 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/17] x86/traps: Assert that we're in CONTEXT_KERNEL in exception entries On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:08:00AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > I would agree, except that I remove the exception_enter calls later in > the series, so that wouldn't work. Ah. > Maybe we should move them into common code outside the specific > exception handlers (idtentry?) when the dust settles. Yeah, that macro is huge but it could survive yet another CALL <func>. :-) Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists