[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <00e701d0b2e2$6b561120$42023360$@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:10:25 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: 'Jaegeuk Kim' <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/12] f2fs: update on-disk extents even under
extent_cache
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk@...nel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 2:40 AM
> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim
> Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 06/12] f2fs: update on-disk extents even under extent_cache
>
> Previously, f2fs_update_extent_cache() updates in-memory extent_cache all the
> time, and then finally preserves its up-to-date extent into on-disk one during
> f2fs_evict_inode.
>
> But, in the following scenario:
>
> 1. mount
> 2. open & write an extent X
> 3. f2fs_evict_inode; on-disk extent is X
> 4. open & update the extent X with Y
> 5. sync; trigger checkpoint
> 6. power-cut
>
> after power-on, f2fs should serve extent Y, but we have an on-disk extent X.
>
> This causes a failure on xfstests/311.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists