linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arch: unify ioremap prototypes and macro aliases

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h5OXyRvZvLGD5ZknO-YUPn675YGv0XdtW1QOO9qmZsug@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jun 2015 15:57:16 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@...com>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Luis Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	mpe@...erman.id.au, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] arch: unify ioremap prototypes and macro aliases

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 04:24:27AM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Some archs define the first parameter to ioremap() as unsigned long,
>> while the balance define it as resource_size_t.  Unify on
>> resource_size_t to enable passing ioremap function pointers.  Also, some
>> archs use function-like macros for defining ioremap aliases, but
>> asm-generic/io.h expects object-like macros, unify on the latter.
>>
>> Move all handling of ioremap aliasing (i.e. ioremap_wt => ioremap) to
>> include/linux/io.h.  Add a check to include/linux/io.h to warn at
>> compile time if an arch violates expectations.
>>
>> Kill ARCH_HAS_IOREMAP_WC and ARCH_HAS_IOREMAP_WT in favor of just
>> testing for ioremap_wc, and ioremap_wt being defined.  This arrangement
>> allows drivers to know when ioremap_<foo> are being re-directed to plain
>> ioremap.
>>
>> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>
> Hmm, this is quite a bit of churn, and doesn't make the interface lot
> more obvious.
>
> I guess it's enough to get the pmem related bits going, but I'd really
> prefer defining the ioremap* prototype in linux/io.h and requiring
> and out of line implementation in the architectures, it's not like
> it's a fast path.  And to avoid the ifdef mess make it something like:
>
> void __iomem *ioremap_flags(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size,
>                         unsigned long prot_val, unsigned flags);

Doesn't 'flags' imply a specific 'prot_val'?

> static inline void __iomem *ioremap(resource_size_t offset, unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, 0);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_prot(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size, unsigned long prot_val)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, prot_val, 0);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_nocache(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, IOREMAP_NOCACHE);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_cache(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, IOREMAP_CACHE);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_uc(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, IOREMAP_UC);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_wc(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, IOREMAP_WC);
> }
>
> static inline void __iomem *ioremap_wt(resource_size_t offset,
>                 unsigned long size)
> {
>         return ioremap_flags(offset, size, 0, IOREMAP_WT);
> }
>
> With all wrappers but ioremap() itself deprecated in the long run.
>
> Besides following the one API one prototype guideline this gives
> us one proper entry point for all the variants.  Additionally
> it can reject non-supported caching modes at run time, e.g. because
> different hardware may or may not support it.  Additionally it
> avoids the need for all these HAVE_IOREMAP_FOO defines, which need
> constant updating.

One useful feature of the ifdef mess as implemented in the patch is
that you could test for whether ioremap_cache() is actually
implemented or falls back to default ioremap().  I think for
completeness archs should publish an ioremap type capabilities mask
for drivers that care... (I can imagine pmem caring), or default to
being permissive if something like IOREMAP_STRICT is not set.  There's
also the wrinkle of archs that can only support certain types of
mappings at a given alignment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/