[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150701072757.GW7252@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:27:57 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz,
hch@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
mhocko@...e.cz, clm@...com, fengguang.wu@...el.com,
david@...morbit.com, gthelen@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 36/51] writeback: implement bdi_for_each_wb()
On Fri 22-05-15 17:13:50, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This will be used to implement bdi-wide operations which should be
> distributed across all its cgroup bdi_writebacks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
One comment below.
> @@ -445,6 +500,14 @@ static inline void wb_blkcg_offline(struct blkcg *blkcg)
> {
> }
>
> +struct wb_iter {
> + int next_id;
> +};
> +
> +#define bdi_for_each_wb(wb_cur, bdi, iter, start_blkcg_id) \
> + for ((iter)->next_id = (start_blkcg_id); \
> + ({ (wb_cur) = !(iter)->next_id++ ? &(bdi)->wb : NULL; }); )
> +
This looks quite confusing. Won't it be easier to understand as:
struct wb_iter {
} __attribute__ ((unused));
#define bdi_for_each_wb(wb_cur, bdi, iter, start_blkcg_id) \
if (((wb_cur) = (!start_blkcg_id ? &(bdi)->wb : NULL)))
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists