linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150701080216.GF3210@x1>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2015 09:02:16 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	DEVICETREE <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	LINUXINPUT <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	RTCLINUX <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:

> On 11 June 2015 09:57, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > To: Opensource [Steve Twiss]
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] mfd: da9062: DA9062 MFD core driver
> > 
> > > > > > Steve Twiss wrote:
> > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_PAGE_SHIFT		0
> > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_PAGE_MASK		(0x3f << 0)
> > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_WRITE_MODE_SHIFT	6
> > > > > > +#define DA9062AA_WRITE_MODE_MASK	(0x01 << 6)
> > > > >
> > > > > Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > For 1 << X, you should use BIT(X).
> > > >
> > > > Steve Twiss wrote:
> > > > The whole of this file is automatically generated by our hardware designers
> > > > I would prefer it if the register definitions and bit fields are not altered [...]
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Lee Jones wrote:
> > To be honest, it's probably not a blocker for acceptance, but if someone
> > writes a patch next week to change all of the (0x01 << X) lines to
> > start using the BIT() macro, I will accept it.  Better to influenced
> > your guys so you are not overly inconvenienced.
> > FWIW, when upstreaming code, the excuse "someone else wrote it", has
> > never been a good one to use on the lists.   Believe me, I've
> > tried. ;)
> 
> Hi Lee,
> 
> Depending on your next step ..
> I can either send a patch to this now or wait until you have reviewed the MFD
> core: if there are any further comments on this, I can update the submission
> retrospectively.

Let's start over.  Please re-submit the set.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/