[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1435739328-17021-1-git-send-email-cleaneye.kim@lge.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +0900
From: SungEun Kim <cleaneye.kim@....com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, pavel@....cz, len.brown@...el.com
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"SungEun Kim" <cleaneye.kim@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] PM / Sleep: Use workqueue for user space wakeup sources garbage collector
From: "SungEun Kim" <cleaneye.kim@....com>
The synchronous synchronize_rcu in wakeup_source_remove makes user process
which writes to /sys/kernel/wake_unlock blocked sometimes.
For example, when android eventhub tries to release wakelock,
this blocking process can occur, and eventhub can't get input event
for a while.
Using workqueue instead of direct function call at pm_wake_unlock
can prevent this unnecessary delay of an user space process.
Signed-off-by: SungEun Kim <cleaneye.kim@....com>
---
kernel/power/wakelock.c | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/power/wakelock.c b/kernel/power/wakelock.c
index 019069c..5df6aa2 100644
--- a/kernel/power/wakelock.c
+++ b/kernel/power/wakelock.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "power.h"
@@ -83,7 +84,9 @@ static inline void decrement_wakelocks_number(void) {}
#define WL_GC_COUNT_MAX 100
#define WL_GC_TIME_SEC 300
+static void __wakelocks_gc(struct work_struct *work);
static LIST_HEAD(wakelocks_lru_list);
+static DECLARE_WORK(wakelock_work, __wakelocks_gc);
static unsigned int wakelocks_gc_count;
static inline void wakelocks_lru_add(struct wakelock *wl)
@@ -96,7 +99,7 @@ static inline void wakelocks_lru_most_recent(struct wakelock *wl)
list_move(&wl->lru, &wakelocks_lru_list);
}
-static void wakelocks_gc(void)
+static void __wakelocks_gc(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wakelock *wl, *aux;
ktime_t now;
@@ -105,6 +108,7 @@ static void wakelocks_gc(void)
return;
now = ktime_get();
+ mutex_lock(&wakelocks_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(wl, aux, &wakelocks_lru_list, lru) {
u64 idle_time_ns;
bool active;
@@ -126,8 +130,14 @@ static void wakelocks_gc(void)
decrement_wakelocks_number();
}
}
+ mutex_unlock(&wakelocks_lock);
wakelocks_gc_count = 0;
}
+
+static void wakelocks_gc(void)
+{
+ schedule_work(&wakelock_work);
+}
#else /* !CONFIG_PM_WAKELOCKS_GC */
static inline void wakelocks_lru_add(struct wakelock *wl) {}
static inline void wakelocks_lru_most_recent(struct wakelock *wl) {}
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists