[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435744933.4689.31.camel@synopsys.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 10:02:14 +0000
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
To: "ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"jh80.chung@...sung.com" <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"tgih.jun@...sung.com" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
"arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com" <arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: handle data blocks > than 4kB if IDMAC is
used
Hi Jaehoon, Seungwon, Ulf,
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 11:25 +0300, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> As per DW MobileStorage databook "each descriptor can transfer up to
> 4kB
> of data in chained mode", moreover buffer size that is put in "des1"
> is
> limited to 13 bits, i.e. for example on attempt to
> IDMAC_SET_BUFFER1_SIZE(desc, 8192) size value that's effectively
> written
> will be 0.
>
> On the platform with 8kB PAGE_SIZE I see dw_mmc gets data blocks in
> SG-list of 8kB size and that leads to unpredictable behavior of the
> SD/MMC controller.
>
> In particular on write to FAT partition of SD-card the controller
> will
> stuck in the middle of DMA transaction.
>
> Solution to the problem is simple - we need to pass large (> 4kB)
> data
> buffers to the controller via multiple descriptors. And that's what
> that change does.
>
> What's interesting I did try original driver on same platform but
> configured with 4kB PAGE_SIZE and may confirm that data blocks passed
> in SG-list to dw_mmc never exeed 4kB limit - that explains why nobody
> ever faced a problem I did.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> Cc: arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> ----------
I'm wondering if there're any comments on that patch or if it could be
applied?
It fixes a real problem on systems on 4K PAGE_SIZE so would be good to
have it in upstream. In particular this is the case with ARC AXS board
which made its way in upstream kernel recently.
Regards,
Alexey--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists