[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150701100939.GR19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 12:09:39 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging
normal ones
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 04:46:33PM -0700, josh@...htriplett.org wrote:
> Consider it a fairly weak concern against. Increasing performance seems
> like a good thing in general; I just don't relish the future "feels less
> responsive" bug reports that take a long time to track down and turn out
> to be "this completely unrelated driver was loaded and started using
> expedited grace periods".
random drivers, or for that matter, new-code of any sort. Should _NOT_
be using expedited grace periods.
They're a horrid hack only suitable for unfixable ABI.
> Then again, perhaps the more relevant concern would be why drivers use
> expedited grace periods in the first place.
Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists