[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150701134143.GY3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 06:41:44 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Short-circuit normal GPs via
expedited GPs
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:05:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:48:27PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS;
> > ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(rsp->gp_wq,
> > + ((gf = READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) &
> > + RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
> > + (!READ_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) &&
> > + !rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp)) ||
> > + rcu_exp_gp_seq_done(rsp->exp_rsp,
> > + rsp->gp_exp_snap),
> > + j);
> > rsp->gp_state = RCU_GP_DONE_FQS;
>
> How can the GP be done if we timed out or got interrupted?
If all the CPUs still blocking the grace period went idle, or in a
NO_HZ_FULL kernel, entered nohz_full userspace execution. Or, if
certain low-probability races happen, went offline.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists