linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf mem: Fill in the missing freeing a session after an error occur

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:42:42 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To:	taeung <treeze.taeung@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] perf mem: Fill in the missing freeing a session
 after an error occur

Em Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:58:23PM +0900, taeung escreveu:
> On 07/01/2015 04:57 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 12:18:45AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> >>@@ -135,24 +134,23 @@ static int report_raw_events(struct perf_mem *mem)
> >>  	if (mem->cpu_list) {
> >>  		ret = perf_session__cpu_bitmap(session, mem->cpu_list,
> >>  					       mem->cpu_bitmap);
> >>-		if (ret)
> >>+		if (ret) {
> >>+			ret = -EINVAL;
> >Why not propagate perf_session__cpu_bitmap() return, this function
> >wasn't being consistent in returning errors, neither was you, as, see
> >below...
 
> perf_session__cpu_bitmap()
> when an error occurs in this function, a error value which is -1 is returned.
> Therefore, this conditional sentence 'if (ret)' have to be changed to 'if (ret < 0)' as below.
> 
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret < 0)
> 	goto out_delete;
> 
> Is it what you say ?

No, the above change is not related to what I mentioned, it is harmless
albeit not needed, what I mentioned was about the part just after the
if:

	if (ret) {
		ret = -EINVAL;        <---------------- This one

But I see you removed that from your latest change, so all is fine now,
I think.

- Arnaldo
 
> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Taeung
> 
> >
> >>  			goto out_delete;
> >>+		}
> >>  	}
> >>-	if (symbol__init(&session->header.env) < 0)
> >>-		return -1;
> >>+	ret = symbol__init(&session->header.env);
> >>+	if (ret < 0)
> >>+		goto out_delete;
> >Here you decided to propagate symbol__init() error return. :-)
> >
> >I applied all the others, including the 3/5 v2 one.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >- Arnaldo
> >
> >>  	printf("# PID, TID, IP, ADDR, LOCAL WEIGHT, DSRC, SYMBOL\n");
> >>-	err = perf_session__process_events(session);
> >>-	if (err)
> >>-		return err;
> >>-
> >>-	return 0;
> >>+	ret = perf_session__process_events(session);
> >>  out_delete:
> >>  	perf_session__delete(session);
> >>-	return err;
> >>+	return ret;
> >>  }
> >>  static int report_events(int argc, const char **argv, struct perf_mem *mem)
> >>-- 
> >>1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/