[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150701183956.446924297@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:40:37 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 30/34] arm/arm64: KVM: Dont clear the VCPU_POWER_OFF flag
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
commit 03f1d4c17edb31b41b14ca3a749ae38d2dd6639d upstream.
If a VCPU was originally started with power off (typically to be brought
up by PSCI in SMP configurations), there is no need to clear the
POWER_OFF flag in the kernel, as this flag is only tested during the
init ioctl itself.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init
/*
* Handle the "start in power-off" case by marking the VCPU as paused.
*/
- if (__test_and_clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
+ if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF, vcpu->arch.features))
vcpu->arch.pause = true;
return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists