lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 21:16:46 +0200 From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, hch@...radead.org, hannes@...xchg.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, vgoyal@...hat.com, lizefan@...wei.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.cz, clm@...com, fengguang.wu@...el.com, david@...morbit.com, gthelen@...gle.com, khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH 48/51] writeback: dirty inodes against their matching cgroup bdi_writeback's On Fri 22-05-15 17:14:02, Tejun Heo wrote: > __mark_inode_dirty() always dirtied the inode against the root wb > (bdi_writeback). The previous patches added all the infrastructure > necessary to attribute an inode against the wb of the dirtying cgroup. > > This patch updates __mark_inode_dirty() so that it uses the wb > associated with the inode instead of unconditionally using the root > one. > > Currently, none of the filesystems has FS_CGROUP_WRITEBACK and all > pages will keep being dirtied against the root wb. > > v2: Updated for per-inode wb association. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> Looks good. You can add: Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com> Honza > --- > fs/fs-writeback.c | 23 +++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c > index 59d76f6..881ea5d 100644 > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c > @@ -1504,7 +1504,6 @@ static noinline void block_dump___mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode) > void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) > { > struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb; > - struct backing_dev_info *bdi = NULL; > int dirtytime; > > trace_writeback_mark_inode_dirty(inode, flags); > @@ -1574,30 +1573,30 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) > * reposition it (that would break b_dirty time-ordering). > */ > if (!was_dirty) { > + struct bdi_writeback *wb = inode_to_wb(inode); > struct list_head *dirty_list; > bool wakeup_bdi = false; > - bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode); > > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); > - spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock); > + spin_lock(&wb->list_lock); > > - WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && > - !test_bit(WB_registered, &bdi->wb.state), > - "bdi-%s not registered\n", bdi->name); > + WARN(bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) && > + !test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state), > + "bdi-%s not registered\n", wb->bdi->name); > > inode->dirtied_when = jiffies; > if (dirtytime) > inode->dirtied_time_when = jiffies; > > if (inode->i_state & (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES)) > - dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty; > + dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty; > else > - dirty_list = &bdi->wb.b_dirty_time; > + dirty_list = &wb->b_dirty_time; > > - wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, &bdi->wb, > + wakeup_bdi = inode_wb_list_move_locked(inode, wb, > dirty_list); > > - spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock); > + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); > trace_writeback_dirty_inode_enqueue(inode); > > /* > @@ -1606,8 +1605,8 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags) > * to make sure background write-back happens > * later. > */ > - if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(bdi) && wakeup_bdi) > - wb_wakeup_delayed(&bdi->wb); > + if (bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(wb->bdi) && wakeup_bdi) > + wb_wakeup_delayed(wb); > return; > } > } > -- > 2.4.0 > -- Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists