[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5594D742.6040202@kyup.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 09:16:34 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext4: make use of sb_getblk_gfp
On 07/02/2015 09:14 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:26:49AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> Switch ext4 to using sb_getblk_gfp with GFP_NOFS added, this fixes
>> possible deadlocks in the page writeback path.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
>
> I've added this to the ext4.git tree, thanks.
>
> - Ted
Thanks!
Just a question that popped to my mind after discussing with a colleague
- Is GFP_NOFS enough here or should it be GFP_NOIO? Presumably the
latter is a stronger guarantee that we are not going to hit any
fs/writeback related code?
Nikolay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists