[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11b09322.1d7ab.14e4c33481b.Coremail.cfme_admin@163.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:38:26 +0800 (CST)
From: cfme_admin <cfme_admin@....com>
To: "Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Cc: "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] sched: fix BUG in preempt_notifier
This is a better way to solve this bug.
Thanks.
At 2015-07-01 15:41:28, "Wanpeng Li" <wanpeng.li@...mail.com> wrote:
>
>
>On 7/1/15 2:33 PM, Lidong Chen wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Lidong Chen <cfme_admin@....com>
>
>Subject: sched,kvm: Fix KVM preempt_notifier usage
>
>The preempt-notifier API needs to sleep with the addition of the
>static_key, we do however need to hold off preemption while modifying
>the preempt notifier list, otherwise a preemption could observe an
>inconsistent list state.
>
>There is no reason to have preemption disabled in the caller,
>registering a preempt notifier is a purely task local affair.
>
>Therefore move the preempt_disable into the functions and change the
>callers to a preemptible context.
>
>Cc: Gleb Natapov<gleb@...nel.org>
>Fixes: 1cde2930e154 ("sched/preempt: Add static_key() to preempt_notifiers")
>Reported-and-Tested-by: Pontus Fuchs<pontus.fuchs@...il.com>
>Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)<peterz@...radead.org>
>
>
>If this commit in tip tree fix your bug?
>
>Regards,
>Wanpeng Li
>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 25 ++++---------------------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index b803e1b..4a5a964 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -2318,15 +2318,12 @@ void wake_up_new_task(struct task_struct *p)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
>>
>> -static struct static_key preempt_notifier_key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE;
>> -
>> /**
>> * preempt_notifier_register - tell me when current is being preempted & rescheduled
>> * @notifier: notifier struct to register
>> */
>> void preempt_notifier_register(struct preempt_notifier *notifier)
>> {
>> - static_key_slow_inc(&preempt_notifier_key);
>> hlist_add_head(¬ifier->link, ¤t->preempt_notifiers);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register);
>> @@ -2340,11 +2337,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_register);
>> void preempt_notifier_unregister(struct preempt_notifier *notifier)
>> {
>> hlist_del(¬ifier->link);
>> - static_key_slow_dec(&preempt_notifier_key);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(preempt_notifier_unregister);
>>
>> -static void __fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> +static void fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> {
>> struct preempt_notifier *notifier;
>>
>> @@ -2352,14 +2348,9 @@ static void __fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> notifier->ops->sched_in(notifier, raw_smp_processor_id());
>> }
>>
>> -static __always_inline void fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> -{
>> - if (static_key_false(&preempt_notifier_key))
>> - __fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(curr);
>> -}
>>
>> static void
>> -__fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
>> +fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
>> struct task_struct *next)
>> {
>> struct preempt_notifier *notifier;
>> @@ -2368,21 +2359,13 @@ __fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
>> notifier->ops->sched_out(notifier, next);
>> }
>>
>> -static __always_inline void
>> -fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
>> - struct task_struct *next)
>> -{
>> - if (static_key_false(&preempt_notifier_key))
>> - __fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(curr, next);
>> -}
>> -
>> #else /* !CONFIG_PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS */
>>
>> -static inline void fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> +static void fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> -static inline void
>> +static void
>> fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(struct task_struct *curr,
>> struct task_struct *next)
>> {
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists