[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <018f01d0b4a2$d74e29f0$85ea7dd0$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 11:41:07 +0300
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>
To: 'Eric Auger' <eric.auger@...aro.org>, eric.auger@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, andre.przywara@....com,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: api: add kvm_irq_routing_extended_msi
Hello!
> What if we use KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag instead of new KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI
> definition? I
> believe this would make an API more consistent and introduce less new definitions.
I have just found one more flaw in your implementation. If you take a look at irqfd_wakeup()...
--- cut ---
/* An event has been signaled, inject an interrupt */
if (irq.type == KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_MSI)
kvm_set_msi(&irq, kvm, KVM_USERSPACE_IRQ_SOURCE_ID, 1,
false);
else
schedule_work(&irqfd->inject);
--- cut ---
You apparently missed KVM_IRQ_ROUTING_EXTENDED_MSI here, as well as in irqfd_update(). But, if you
accept my API proposal, this becomes irrelevant.
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists