[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435799484.3482.15.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 03:11:24 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, josh@...htriplett.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods
encouraging normal ones
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 09:17 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 07:00:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > > That is a bit extreme, Peter.
> >
> > Of course; but I'm really not seeing people taking due care with them
>
> ;-)
>
> > > Are a huge pile of them coming in this merge window or something?
> > > What raised your concerns on this issue?
> >
> > This is complete horse manure (breaking the nvidiot binary blob is a
> > good thing):
> >
> > 74b51ee152b6 ("ACPI / osl: speedup grace period in acpi_os_map_cleanup")
>
> Really???
>
> I am not concerned about this one. After all, one of the first things
> that people do for OS-jitter-sensitive workloads is to get rid of
> binary blobs.
I know two users who have no choice but to use the nvidia driver with
their realtime applications, as nouveau is not up to the task.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists