linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] kdbus: handle WARN_ON cases properly when decrementing quota

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150702102748.GR17917@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:27:48 +0300
From:	Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net>
To:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...glemail.com>,
	Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/5] kdbus: handle WARN_ON cases properly when
 decrementing quota

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 10:37:05AM +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Sergei Zviagintsev <sergei@...v.net> wrote:
> > If we spotted inconsistency, fix it by setting values to zero.
> 
> Why?
> 
> I prefer doing nothing and just bailing out on programming errors.
> Setting it to 0 just complicates debugging and drops possibly useful
> information ('what was the counter value at that time?').

Thank you for commenting on this! Now it seems to be clear for me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/