[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150702121126.GP3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 14:11:26 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Fredrik Markström <fredrik.markstrom@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cputime: Make the reported utime+stime correspond to
the actual runtime.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Fredrik Markström wrote:
> But I don't think the "wobblies" in the division is, since the division doesn't
> affect the sum (prev->stime + prev->rtime) anymore, so that comment should
> go, right ?
Agreed.
> Well I guess it can be a problem on a system where 120 cores are doing nothing
> but hammering on rusage... on the other hand I feel a system like that
> deserves it. :)
True, doing stupid deserves stupid, but somehow people often tend to
disagree with it when its them doing it :-)
Imagine someone doing a gprof like thing where they stuff a getrusage()
call in the mcount hook and then run their many threaded application.
Provided they use RUSAGE_THREAD it doesn't even sound too insane..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists