[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55953E71.4070109@atmel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 15:36:49 +0200
From: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<wenyou.yang@...el.com>, <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
<leilei.zhao@...el.com>, <josh.wu@...el.com>,
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<pawel.moll@....com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] tty/serial: at91: fix some macro definitions to
fit coding style
Hi Arnd,
I've just sent a new series of patches to remove all those macros.
By the way, the patch dedicated to this update was created using coccinelle.
Based on Alexandre comment, I leave __raw_writel() and __raw_readl() for now.
Best Regards,
Cyrille
Le 30/06/2015 22:28, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Tuesday 30 June 2015 16:05:15 Cyrille Pitchen wrote:
>> +#define UART_PUT_CR(port, v) __raw_writel(v, (port)->membase + ATMEL_US_CR)
>> +#define UART_GET_MR(port) __raw_readl((port)->membase + ATMEL_US_MR)
>> +#define UART_PUT_MR(port, v) __raw_writel(v, (port)->membase + ATMEL_US_MR)
>> +#define UART_PUT_IER(port, v) __raw_writel(v, (port)->membase + ATMEL_US_IER)
>>
>
> How about removing these macros entirely? I'm not aware of other drivers
> doing it like this, and it does not seem to add any value?
>
> At the same time, you could use readl_relaxed() to make the driver
> endian-safe.
>
> Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists