[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <02ea01d0b4dd$1186e690$3494b3b0$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:37:55 +0300
From: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@...sung.com>
To: 'Eric Auger' <eric.auger@...aro.org>, eric.auger@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, andre.przywara@....com,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 7/7] KVM: arm: implement kvm_set_msi by gsi direct mapping
Hello!
> > Given API change i suggest (using KVM_MSI_VALID_DEVID flag), we could get rid of all these
if()'s
> > here. Just forward all parameters to vGIC implementation code and let it do its checks.
> I don't understand this comment. Here this is the kernel struct that is
> used (struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry) and not the user one
> (kvm_irq_routing_entry). The kernel struct does not have the flag field.
Easy. ARM code can always use struct kvm_extended_msi, and flags can go to this structure.
> Another reason I think to keep using the type for homogeneity.
Homogeneity is perfect IMHO.
If that would be simpler for you, i could post a patch for this which i made on top of your series.
Sorry, i don't have time to respin the whole thing, busy with qemu GICv3 fight :)
Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists