[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW5bUGQT7UYP2KAiuhFixx6brdaSpBWZbi1dsnm1sb1-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:56:11 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/17] x86/entry/64: Migrate 64-bit and compat syscalls
to new exit hooks
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:49 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 12:33:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> These need to be migrated together, as the compat case used to jump
>> into the middle of the 64-bit exit code.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
>> index efe0b1e499fa..ac0658142ae1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S
>> @@ -209,10 +209,10 @@ sysexit_from_sys_call:
>> .endm
>>
>> .macro auditsys_exit exit
>> - testl $(_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK & ~_TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT), ASM_THREAD_INFO(TI_flags, %rsp, SIZEOF_PTREGS)
>> - jnz ia32_ret_from_sys_call
>> TRACE_IRQS_ON
>> ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>> + testl $(_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK & ~_TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT), ASM_THREAD_INFO(TI_flags, %rsp, SIZEOF_PTREGS)
>> + jnz ia32_ret_from_sys_call
>
> I guess you want to use tabs here like the rest of the macro does.
>
Oops. I wrote this before everything got tabified and I guess I
didn't fix it up right.
>> movl %eax, %esi /* second arg, syscall return value */
>> cmpl $-MAX_ERRNO, %eax /* is it an error ? */
>> jbe 1f
>> @@ -227,11 +227,10 @@ sysexit_from_sys_call:
>> testl %edi, ASM_THREAD_INFO(TI_flags, %rsp, SIZEOF_PTREGS)
>> jz \exit
>> xorl %eax, %eax /* Do not leak kernel information */
>> - movq %rax, R11(%rsp)
>
> I guess that change needs at least some explanation in the commit
> message. AFAIU, this is RIP we shouldn't be zeroing for we need it in
> int_ret_from_sys_call...
This change is a mistake. There was another rebase issue in here that
I fixed, but apparently I still haven't gotten it right. Sigh.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists