[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55956AC1.9000902@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 18:45:53 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] netlink: Delete an unnecessary check before the function
call "module_put"
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 18:38:12 +0200
The module_put() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
---
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index dea9253..9a0ae71 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int __netlink_remove_tap(struct netlink_tap *nt)
out:
spin_unlock(&netlink_tap_lock);
- if (found && nt->module)
+ if (found)
module_put(nt->module);
return found ? 0 : -ENODEV;
--
2.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists