linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mmc: sprd: add MMC host driver for Spreadtrum SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAfSe-uuO5VYA9_x_6mog9r=KNTtudRCqz7q46TZhWw8BagMKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jul 2015 10:35:16 +0800
From:	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To:	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Cc:	Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
	ulf.hansson@...aro.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, billows.wu@...eadtrum.com,
	Wei Qiao (乔伟) <wei.qiao@...eadtrum.com>,
	baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com, ning.yang@...eadtrum.com,
	orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com, jason.wu@...eadtrum.com,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	chris@...ntf.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mmc: sprd: add MMC host driver for Spreadtrum SoC

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is sdhost based on SDHCI controller?
> Why don't use sdhci.c? Is there any reason?
>
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>

Because of base64 code problem of his email server, I'm reporting his
reply instead.

>From Billows Wu <billows.wu@...eadtrum.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Jaehoon,
Sdhost driver is not based on SDHCI controller.
Our MMC controller is not a standard controller which meets host
controller specification completely.
We add some registers and change some bits in the remaining register,
such as about clock and regulator portion.
If our driver base on SDHCI controller, we must change many codes in
sdhci.c, and our MMC driver will become more complicated.
In order to better use our controller capability and make MMC driver
more compact, we do not use SDHCI controller.

Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/