| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20150702181036.GF9633@sonymobile.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:10:36 -0700 From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...ymobile.com> To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> CC: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Set load on vmmc and vqmmc On Wed 01 Jul 03:59 PDT 2015, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 09:38:45PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > > +- vmmc-load: requested load for the vmmc regulator, in mA > > +- vqmmc-load: requested load for the vqmmc regulator, in mA > > Isn't this something that should have default values from the spec? The > binding also ought to say what a "requested load" is. It sounds reasonable that these values should simply come from the card specification; I don't know if there's any sane way for us to list them though (other than just stating them in dt). I'll have to do some more investigation on the subject... And I get your point that it's not "requested load", it's the power requirements of the card...so it should be rephrased. Thanks, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists