[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1435806379.3526.31.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 11:06:19 +0800
From: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
CC: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <ted.lin@...iatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"Eddie Huang" <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: mt8173: add clock_null
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:54 +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > The problem is not that you use fixed clocks for non software
> > controllable clocks of unknwown rates, but that you try to use a single
> > clock for all of them and name it 'dummy' or 'null'. Name it
> >
> > dpi_ck {
> > compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > rate = <0>; /* unknown, generated by some Analog block */
> > };
>
> It would be nice, though, to use the real clock rates.
> Otherwise, we end up with a bunch of unknown clock rates, like this:
>
> clock enable_cnt prepare_cnt rate
> accuracy phase
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> clk_null 2 2 0
> 0 0
> mm_lvds_cts 0 0 0
> 0 0
> mm_lvds_pixel 0 0 0
> 0 0
> mm_dpi1_pixel 0 0 0
> 0 0
> Furthermore, at least some of these children clocks are possible
> source clocks for other clocks for which we do want to know the
> resulting frequency. For example, the "dmpll_*" clocks are mux inputs
> for many of the subsystem clocks.
These clocks such as clkph_mck_o are configured by other modules before
kernel init, and their rates may different among platforms. So we can't
use a hard-coded rate for them. And we also don't care the actual rate
of these clocks, so assign a dummy rate such as 0 to them should be a
better way.
Best regards,
james
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists