[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150702031529.GB3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 20:15:29 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 0/5] Expedited grace periods encouraging
normal ones
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 04:50:45AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-07-01 at 19:18 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Does their normal workload trigger the condition that results in the
> > expedited grace period? If so, do they use NO_HZ_FULL?
>
> They're having no trouble that I'm aware of, and I definitely would be
> made aware. They're not currently using a kernel with NO_HZ_FULL even
> built in, as that stuff is far far too raw in the current kernel.
>
> They may meet a NO_HZ_FULL enabled kernel soonish, but will be told to
> not turn it on for anything other than pure compute, as NO_HZ_FULL is
> currently not usable for mixed load in partitioned box, much less rt.
OK, sounds like synchronize_rcu_expedited() is a complete non-problem
for them, then.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists