[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150703085749.GE23297@linux>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:27:49 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Jingchang Lu <b35083@...escale.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 39/41] clocksource: vf_pit: Migrate to new 'set-state'
interface
On 03-07-15, 10:10, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > .features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT,
> > - .set_mode = pit_set_mode,
> > + .set_state_shutdown = pit_shutdown,
> > + .set_state_periodic = pit_set_periodic,
>
> I'm not really familiar with the interface, but given that we announce
> the feature CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT shouldn't we add a set_state_oneshot
> callback here?
We weren't doing anything in pit_set_mode(ONESHOT) and so that
callback is not implemented. In case you need to do something in
set_state_oneshot(), we can add it back.
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists