[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5596626F.5050003@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:22:39 +0800
From: Mark yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
CC: dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sandy.huang@...k-chips.com, dkm@...k-chips.com, zwl@...k-chips.com,
xw@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/rockchip: vop: support plane scale
On 2015年07月03日 17:58, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>> >>Aren't the scl_modes for CbCr planes always the same as for Y plane?
>> >
>> >
>> >No, such as src(1920 x 1080) -> dst(1280x800), yuv format is NV12.
>> >so Y plane horizontal and vertical is scale down.
>> >
>> >but src_w = 1920 / 2 = 960 < 1280
>> > src_h = 1080 / 2 = 540 < 800.
>> >
>> >So Cbcr horizontal and vertical is scale up.
> Sorry, I don't follow.
>
> If we scale down Y plane in NV12 from 1920x1080 to 1280x800, then
> original CbCr plane will be 960x540 and destination CbCr plane will be
> 640x400 (because CbCr plane of NV12 is subsampled 2x2, which is half
> the width and half the height of Y plane), so both planes are being
> scaled down.
>
destination CbCr plane is 1280x800, destination can't be subsample.
--
Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists