linux-kernel - Re: Kconfig: '+config' valid syntax?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1435920723.2423.63.camel@tiscali.nl>
Date:	Fri, 03 Jul 2015 12:52:03 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Andreas Ruprecht <andreas.ruprecht@....de>,
	Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>
Cc:	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	hengelein Stefan <stefan.hengelein@....de>,
	linux@...inikbrodowski.net
Subject: Re: Kconfig: '+config' valid syntax?

On vr, 2015-07-03 at 11:29 +0200, Andreas Ruprecht wrote:
> Well, as I mentioned earlier, with a patch similar to the one below
> this
> warning is also generated three times for every '---' before 'help'.

You're right, that was in your first message. It already slipped my
mind.

> So we would need to add special treatment for '-' also in the command
> case, right? But that doesn't look appealing to me, more like a dirty,
> dirty hack around the actual problem...

It seems so.

Someone ambitious might want to jump in the lex rules and see what can
be done in a clean way. (Perhaps that will start with renaming COMMAND
and PARAM and/or documenting these states.) I think I already
demonstrated that I'm too unfamiliar with lex for it to make sense to
volunteer.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/