[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+H2tpFO2uz3Pr4bxoesqc8teF+SYhw-GqKOdk_w4_p5KvJR6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 10:50:19 +0800
From: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
"chris@...ntf.net" <chris@...ntf.net>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, billows.wu@...eadtrum.com,
Wei Qiao (乔伟) <wei.qiao@...eadtrum.com>,
baolin.wang@...eadtrum.com, ning.yang@...eadtrum.com,
Orson Zhai(翟京) <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>,
jason.wu@...eadtrum.com,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mmc: sprd: add MMC host driver for Spreadtrum SoC
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> Thanks for your quick reply.
>> I have one question to your last comment.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 1:50 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 2:23 AM, Chunyan Zhang
>>> <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Billows Wu <billows.wu@...eadtrum.com>
>
> [...]
>
>>>> +const struct of_device_id sdhost_of_match[] = {
>>>> + {.compatible = "sprd,sd-sdhost-3.0", .data = &sd_caps_info,},
>>>> + {.compatible = "sprd,wifi-sdhost-3.0", .data = &wifi_caps_info,},
>>>> + {.compatible = "sprd,emmc-sdhost-3.0", .data = &emmc_caps_info,},
>>>
>>> What these are connected to is irrelevant to the driver and compatible
>>> string. All these differences belong in the DT unless the IP blocks
>>> are really different.
>>
>> It's my idea to let Billows do like this.
>> I learn from SSP part in freescale "arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-evk.dts"
>> Their ssp0-ssp2 each have 2 roles, mmc or generic spi bus.
>> And they may write one of their combo configuration like this:
>
> That is a bit different as the host controller is operating in
> completely different modes. In your case, the host controller is the
> same and functions the same way, but just has different cards
> attached.
>
>>
>> 43 ssp1: ssp@...12000 {
>> 44 compatible = "fsl,imx28-mmc";
>> 45 bus-width = <8>;
>> 46 wp-gpios = <&gpio0 28 0>;
>> 47 };
>> 48
>> 49 ssp2: ssp@...14000 {
>> 50 #address-cells = <1>;
>> 51 #size-cells = <0>;
>> 52 compatible = "fsl,imx28-spi";
>> 53 pinctrl-names = "default";
>> 54 pinctrl-0 = <&spi2_pins_a>;
>> 55 status = "okay";
>> 56
>> 57 flash: m25p80@0 {
>> 58 #address-cells = <1>;
>> 59 #size-cells = <1>;
>> 60 compatible = "sst,sst25vf016b";
>> 61 spi-max-frequency = <40000000>;
>> 62 reg = <0>;
>> 63 };
>> 64 };
>>
>> Billows tell me they also have 3 roles in their sd host controller
>> corresponding to 3 kinds of different operation.
>> He used to create "sprd,name" property for this. Is it a good way or
>> anything else better?
>
> Why do you need to know? You can define parameters which can't be
> probed such as bus width, voltage, and clock freq. in DT for each
> host. The MMC subsys core will figure out the type of device attached.
I think you're right.
Thanks!
-orson
>
> Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists