[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1435927569-41132-1-git-send-email-dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 14:46:05 +0200
From: Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux390@...ibm.com, Dominik Dingel <dingel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] s390/mm: Fixup hugepage sw-emulated code removal
Heiko noticed that the current check for hugepage support on s390 is a little bit to
harsh as systems which do not support will crash.
The reason is that pageblock_order can now get negative when we set HPAGE_SHIFT to 0.
To avoid all this and to avoid opening another can of worms with enabling
HUGETLB_PAGE_SIZE_VARIABLE I think it would be best to simply allow architectures to
define their own hugepages_supported().
Thanks
Dominik
Dominik Dingel (4):
Revert "s390/mm: change HPAGE_SHIFT type to int"
Revert "s390/mm: make hugepages_supported a boot time decision"
mm: hugetlb: allow hugepages_supported to be architecture specific
s390/hugetlb: add hugepages_supported define
arch/s390/include/asm/hugetlb.h | 1 +
arch/s390/include/asm/page.h | 8 ++++----
arch/s390/kernel/setup.c | 2 --
arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c | 2 --
include/linux/hugetlb.h | 17 ++++++++---------
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.3.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists