[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <347f8e8a9ec4c71bab9713bc2e980ebb@agner.ch>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:50:11 +0200
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
shawn.guo@...aro.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] ARM: dts: vf500-colibri: Add device tree node for
touchscreen support
On 2015-06-30 08:54, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> Add device tree node for touchscreen support on Colibri VF50. The
> touchscreen functionality on VF50 uses the ADC channels of Vybrid
> and some GPIOs. Also add pinctrl nodes for proper pinmux.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dts | 4 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri.dtsi | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> index 7fc782c..c5efb57 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri-eval-v3.dts
> @@ -15,3 +15,7 @@
> model = "Toradex Colibri VF50 on Colibri Evaluation Board";
> compatible = "toradex,vf500-colibri_vf50-on-eval",
> "toradex,vf500-colibri_vf50", "fsl,vf500";
> };
> +
> +&touchctrl {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri.dtsi
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri.dtsi
> index cee34a3..4807a32 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf500-colibri.dtsi
> @@ -17,4 +17,50 @@
> memory {
> reg = <0x80000000 0x8000000>;
> };
> +
> + touchctrl: vf50_touchctrl {
> + compatible = "toradex,vf50-touchctrl";
> + io-channels = <&adc1 0>,<&adc0 0>,
> + <&adc0 1>,<&adc1 2>;
> + xp-gpios = <&gpio0 13 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + xm-gpios = <&gpio2 29 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + yp-gpios = <&gpio0 12 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + ym-gpios = <&gpio0 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pen-detect-gpios = <&gpio0 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pen-pullup-gpios = <&gpio0 9 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + pinctrl-names = "idle","default","gpios";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_touchctrl_idle>;
> + pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_touchctrl_default>;
> + pinctrl-2 = <&pinctrl_touchctrl_gpios>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&iomuxc {
> + vf610-colibri {
> + pinctrl_touchctrl_idle: touchctrl_idle {
> + fsl,pins = <
> + VF610_PAD_PTA18__GPIO_8 0x206d
I think the detect pin should be in Hi-Z, not be pulled up. Probably the
resistance over the plates is much smaller on pen down, hence it doesn't
matter too much.
> + VF610_PAD_PTA19__GPIO_9 0x206d
> + >;
> + };
> +
> + pinctrl_touchctrl_default: touchctrl_default {
> + fsl,pins = <
> + VF610_PAD_PTA18__ADC0_SE0 0x2060
> + VF610_PAD_PTA19__ADC0_SE1 0x2060
> + VF610_PAD_PTA16__ADC1_SE0 0x2060
> + VF610_PAD_PTB2__ADC1_SE2 0x2060
> + >;
> + };
> +
> + pinctrl_touchctrl_gpios: touchctrl_gpios {
> + fsl,pins = <
> + VF610_PAD_PTA23__GPIO_13 0x22ed
> + VF610_PAD_PTB23__GPIO_93 0x22ed
> + VF610_PAD_PTA22__GPIO_12 0x22ed
> + VF610_PAD_PTA11__GPIO_4 0x22ed
> + >;
> + };
Hm, those have pull-ups on too, since you set them as output in the
drivers open function, I don't think this is necessary.
> + };
> };
--
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists