| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1435933551-28696-6-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 16:25:50 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] net: mvneta: Allow different queues
The mvneta driver allows to change the default RX queue trough the rxq_def
kernel parameter.
However, the current code doesn't allow to have any value but 0. It is
actively checked for in the driver's probe because the drivers makes a
number of assumption and takes a number of shortcuts in order to just use
that RX queue.
Remove these limitations in order to be able to specify any available
queue.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 80 +++++------------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
index aedd21ed9532..0d21b8a779d9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ struct mvneta_rx_queue {
/* The hardware supports eight (8) rx queues, but we are only allowing
* the first one to be used. Therefore, let's just allocate one queue.
*/
-static int rxq_number = 1;
+static int rxq_number = 8;
static int txq_number = 8;
static int rxq_def;
@@ -765,14 +765,7 @@ static void mvneta_port_up(struct mvneta_port *pp)
mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_TXQ_CMD, q_map);
/* Enable all initialized RXQs. */
- q_map = 0;
- for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
- struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq = &pp->rxqs[queue];
- if (rxq->descs != NULL)
- q_map |= (1 << queue);
- }
-
- mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_CMD, q_map);
+ mvreg_write(pp, MVNETA_RXQ_CMD, BIT(rxq_def));
}
/* Stop the Ethernet port activity */
@@ -1429,17 +1422,6 @@ static u32 mvneta_skb_tx_csum(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct sk_buff *skb)
return MVNETA_TX_L4_CSUM_NOT;
}
-/* Returns rx queue pointer (find last set bit) according to causeRxTx
- * value
- */
-static struct mvneta_rx_queue *mvneta_rx_policy(struct mvneta_port *pp,
- u32 cause)
-{
- int queue = fls(cause >> 8) - 1;
-
- return (queue < 0 || queue >= rxq_number) ? NULL : &pp->rxqs[queue];
-}
-
/* Drop packets received by the RXQ and free buffers */
static void mvneta_rxq_drop_pkts(struct mvneta_port *pp,
struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq)
@@ -2139,33 +2121,8 @@ static int mvneta_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
* RX packets
*/
cause_rx_tx |= port->cause_rx_tx;
- if (rxq_number > 1) {
- while ((cause_rx_tx & MVNETA_RX_INTR_MASK_ALL) && (budget > 0)) {
- int count;
- struct mvneta_rx_queue *rxq;
- /* get rx queue number from cause_rx_tx */
- rxq = mvneta_rx_policy(pp, cause_rx_tx);
- if (!rxq)
- break;
-
- /* process the packet in that rx queue */
- count = mvneta_rx(pp, budget, rxq);
- rx_done += count;
- budget -= count;
- if (budget > 0) {
- /* set off the rx bit of the
- * corresponding bit in the cause rx
- * tx register, so that next iteration
- * will find the next rx queue where
- * packets are received on
- */
- cause_rx_tx &= ~((1 << rxq->id) << 8);
- }
- }
- } else {
- rx_done = mvneta_rx(pp, budget, &pp->rxqs[rxq_def]);
- budget -= rx_done;
- }
+ rx_done = mvneta_rx(pp, budget, &pp->rxqs[rxq_def]);
+ budget -= rx_done;
if (budget > 0) {
cause_rx_tx = 0;
@@ -2377,26 +2334,19 @@ static void mvneta_cleanup_txqs(struct mvneta_port *pp)
/* Cleanup all Rx queues */
static void mvneta_cleanup_rxqs(struct mvneta_port *pp)
{
- int queue;
-
- for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++)
- mvneta_rxq_deinit(pp, &pp->rxqs[queue]);
+ mvneta_rxq_deinit(pp, &pp->rxqs[rxq_def]);
}
/* Init all Rx queues */
static int mvneta_setup_rxqs(struct mvneta_port *pp)
{
- int queue;
-
- for (queue = 0; queue < rxq_number; queue++) {
- int err = mvneta_rxq_init(pp, &pp->rxqs[queue]);
- if (err) {
- netdev_err(pp->dev, "%s: can't create rxq=%d\n",
- __func__, queue);
- mvneta_cleanup_rxqs(pp);
- return err;
- }
+ int err = mvneta_rxq_init(pp, &pp->rxqs[rxq_def]);
+ if (err) {
+ netdev_err(pp->dev, "%s: can't create rxq=%d\n",
+ __func__, rxq_def);
+ mvneta_cleanup_rxqs(pp);
+ return err;
}
return 0;
@@ -3022,14 +2972,6 @@ static int mvneta_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int err;
int cpu;
- /* Our multiqueue support is not complete, so for now, only
- * allow the usage of the first RX queue
- */
- if (rxq_def != 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid rxq_def argument: %d\n", rxq_def);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
dev = alloc_etherdev_mqs(sizeof(struct mvneta_port), txq_number, rxq_number);
if (!dev)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.4.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists