[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150703164624.77188a63@free-electrons.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 16:46:24 +0200
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] net: mvneta: Statically assign queues to CPUs
Maxime,
On Fri, 3 Jul 2015 16:25:51 +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> +static void mvneta_percpu_enable(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct mvneta_port *pp = arg;
> +
> + enable_percpu_irq(pp->dev->irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> +}
> +
> static int mvneta_open(struct net_device *dev)
> {
> struct mvneta_port *pp = netdev_priv(dev);
> @@ -2655,6 +2662,19 @@ static int mvneta_open(struct net_device *dev)
> goto err_cleanup_txqs;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Even though the documentation says that request_percpu_irq
> + * doesn't enable the interrupts automatically, it actually
> + * does so on the local CPU.
> + *
> + * Make sure it's disabled.
> + */
> + disable_percpu_irq(pp->dev->irq);
> +
> + /* Enable per-CPU interrupt on the one CPU we care about */
> + smp_call_function_single(rxq_def % num_online_cpus(),
> + mvneta_percpu_enable, pp, true);
What happens if that CPU goes offline through CPU hotplug?
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists