lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55961AB3.70801@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2015 13:16:35 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:	<rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	<will.deacon@....com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<jason@...edaemon.net>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>, <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	<patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ACPI : introduce macros for using the ACPI specification
 version

Hi Al,

On 2015/7/3 7:48, Al Stone wrote:
> Add the __ACPI_FADT_SPEC_VERSION() helper macro to build a proper version
> number from a major and minor revision number.  Add also macros that use
> the helper to construct the current version from the values in the FADT
> (i.e., ACPI_FADT_SPEC_VERSION) and both the 5.1 and 6.0 versions.
>
> These macros are added in order to simplify retrieving and comparing ACPI
> specification version numbers, since this is becoming a more frequent need.
> In particular, there are some architectures that require at least a certain
> version of the spec, and there are differences in some structure sizes that
> have changed with recent versions but can only be tracked by spec version
> number.
>
> Fixes: aeb823bbacc2 (ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for FADT table.)

If I understand correctly, will it be (and for next two patches as well):

0cff8dc0099f (ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for MADT table.)?

FADT table update was not introduce any regressions for ARM64
I think.

Thanks
Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ