lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150703163928.GR3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jul 2015 18:39:28 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Cc:	Rabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@...s.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?] Livelock in pick_next_task_fair() / idle_balance()

On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 07:25:11AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 40a7fcb..f7cc1ef 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5898,6 +5898,10 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	while (!list_empty(tasks)) {
> +
> +		if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1)

Should we make that ->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE ?

> +			break;
> +
>  		p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
>  
>  		env->loop++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ