[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55963506.8020200@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 09:08:54 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>, eric.auger@...com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org,
marc.zyngier@....com, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
avi.kivity@...il.com, mtosatti@...hat.com, feng.wu@...el.com,
joro@...tes.org, b.reynal@...tualopensystems.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/17] irq: bypass: Extend skeleton for ARM forwarding
control
On 02/07/2015 15:17, Eric Auger wrote:
> + void (*stop_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + void (*resume_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
Also, can you call these just "stop"/"resume" ...
> + void (*add_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*del_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *,
> + struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> };
>
> struct irq_bypass_consumer {
> struct list_head node;
> void *token;
> - void (*add_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> - void (*del_producer)(struct irq_bypass_producer *);
> + unsigned int gsi; /* the guest gsi */
> + struct kvm *kvm;
> + void (*stop_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
> + void (*resume_consumer)(struct irq_bypass_consumer *);
... and same here? The KVM functions could be named
- kvm_arch_irq_bypass_add_producer
- kvm_arch_irq_bypass_del_producer
- kvm_arch_irq_bypass_stop
- kvm_arch_irq_bypass_resume
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists