[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507051049480.31060@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 11:00:14 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: Fix boot crash in the early FPU code
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Btw., is it a GCC bug or a known GCC property that a structure with a 16-byte
> alignment attribute does not get properly aligned on the stack?
What's the stack alignment mandated by the x86 psABI? Is that anything
beyond what the PUSH instructions imply (i.e. 4 bytes for 32-bit and 8
bytes for 64-bit targets)? Otherwise GCC might not be smart enough to
apply the right subtract and mask operations to the stack/frame pointer.
This might even have been documented with the alignment attribute.
> So fix this bug by making the variable static again, but also mark it
> __initdata this time, because fpu__init_system_mxcsr() is now an
> __init function.
You could have used `alloca' and manually aligned the structure within
the area obtained too (to avoid static storage if desired).
FWIW,
Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists