lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 04 Jul 2015 16:08:47 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Pintu Kumar <pintu.k@...sung.com>
Cc:	corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
	gorcunov@...nvz.org, mhocko@...e.cz, emunson@...mai.com,
	kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, standby24x7@...il.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov@...allels.com, hughd@...gle.com,
	minchan@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	xypron.glpk@....de, dzickus@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, uobergfe@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
	ddstreet@...e.org, sasha.levin@...cle.com, koct9i@...il.com,
	mgorman@...e.de, cj@...ux.com, opensource.ganesh@...il.com,
	vinmenon@...eaurora.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, cpgs@...sung.com,
	pintu_agarwal@...oo.com, vishnu.ps@...sung.com,
	rohit.kr@...sung.com, iqbal.ams@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/sysctl.c: Add /proc/sys/vm/shrink_memory feature

On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:50:07 +0530, Pintu Kumar said:
> This patch provides 2 things:

> 2. Enable shrink_all_memory API in kernel with new CONFIG_SHRINK_MEMORY.
> Currently, shrink_all_memory function is used only during hibernation.
> With the new config we can make use of this API for non-hibernation case
> also without disturbing the hibernation case.

> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c

> @@ -3571,12 +3571,17 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_to_reclaim)
>  	struct reclaim_state reclaim_state;
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.nr_to_reclaim = nr_to_reclaim,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINK_MEMORY
> +		.gfp_mask = (GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE | GFP_RECLAIM_MASK),
> +		.hibernation_mode = 0,
> +#else
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE,
> +		.hibernation_mode = 1,
> +#endif


That looks like a bug just waiting to happen.  What happens if we
call an actual hibernation mode in a SHRINK_MEMORY=y kernel, and it finds
an extra gfp mask bit set, and hibernation_mode set to an unexpected value?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ