linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: introduce driver for the Atmel SDMMC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 04 Jul 2015 10:30:28 +0200
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	ulf.hansson@...aro.org, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-of-at91: introduce driver for the Atmel
 SDMMC

A nit only: a license mismatch.

On vr, 2015-07-03 at 16:17 +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> 
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
> + * your option) any later version.

This states the license is GPL v2 or later.

> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

And, according to include/linux/module.h, this states the license is
(only) GPL v2. So I think that either the comment at the top of this
file or the ident used in MODULE_LICENSE() needs to change.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/