linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1436168690-32102-5-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon,  6 Jul 2015 00:44:44 -0700
From:	Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	Dongsu Park <dpark@...teo.net>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Ming Lin <mlin@...nel.org>,
	Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/11] block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_discard

From: Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>

The split code in blkdev_issue_discard() can go away now
that any driver that cares does the split.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>
---
 block/blk-lib.c | 73 +++++++++++----------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 7688ee3..3bf3c4a 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -43,34 +43,17 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
-	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
-	int alignment;
 	struct bio_batch bb;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 
-	if (!q)
+	if (!q || !nr_sects)
 		return -ENXIO;
 
 	if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
-	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
-
-	/*
-	 * Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
-	 * granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
-	 */
-	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
-	if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
-		/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-
 	if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE) {
 		if (!blk_queue_secdiscard(q))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -82,52 +65,24 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	bb.wait = &wait;
 
 	blk_start_plug(&plug);
-	while (nr_sects) {
-		unsigned int req_sects;
-		sector_t end_sect, tmp;
 
-		bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
-		if (!bio) {
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
+	bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
+	if (!bio) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
-		req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_discard_sectors);
-
-		/*
-		 * If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
-		 * misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
-		 */
-		end_sect = sector + req_sects;
-		tmp = end_sect;
-		if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
-		    sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
-			end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
-			sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
-			end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
-			req_sects = end_sect - sector;
-		}
+	bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
+	bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
+	bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
+	bio->bi_private = &bb;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
-		bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
-		bio->bi_bdev = bdev;
-		bio->bi_private = &bb;
+	bio->bi_iter.bi_size = nr_sects << 9;
 
-		bio->bi_iter.bi_size = req_sects << 9;
-		nr_sects -= req_sects;
-		sector = end_sect;
+	atomic_inc(&bb.done);
+	submit_bio(type, bio);
 
-		atomic_inc(&bb.done);
-		submit_bio(type, bio);
-
-		/*
-		 * We can loop for a long time in here, if someone does
-		 * full device discards (like mkfs). Be nice and allow
-		 * us to schedule out to avoid softlocking if preempt
-		 * is disabled.
-		 */
-		cond_resched();
-	}
+out:
 	blk_finish_plug(&plug);
 
 	/* Wait for bios in-flight */
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/